Derivative of a Composite Function

Let g be differentiable at x, and let f be differentiable at z = g ( x ). Then the composite function y = f ( g ( x )

The chain rule

Let $g$ be differentiable at $x$, and let $f$ be differentiable at $z = g ( x )$. Then the composite function $y = f ( g ( x ) )$ is differentiable at $x$, and its derivative is the product of the derivative of $f$ evaluated at $g ( x )$ and the derivative of $g$ at $x$:

\[D [ f ( g ( x ) ) ] = f^{'} ( g ( x ) ) \cdot g^{'} ( x )\]

This result is known as the chain rule. It states that to differentiate a composite function, one multiplies the derivative of the outer function, evaluated at the inner function, by the derivative of the inner function.

In Leibniz notation, if $y = f ( u )$ and $u = g ( x )$, the chain rule takes the form:

\[\frac{d y}{d x} = \frac{d y}{d u} \cdot \frac{d u}{d x}\]

Proof

To prove that $D [ f ( g ( x ) ) ] = f^{‘} ( g ( x ) ) \cdot g^{‘} ( x )$ we calculate the following limit:

\[D [ f ( g ( x ) ) ] = \underset{h \rightarrow 0}{lim} \frac{f ( g ( x + h ) ) - f ( g ( x ) )}{h}\]

Let $z = g ( x )$, then $g ( x + h ) - g ( x ) = \Delta z .$ This implies that $g ( x + h ) = g ( x ) + \Delta z .$ The limit becomes:

\[D [ f ( g ( x ) ) ] = \underset{h \rightarrow 0}{lim} \frac{f ( z + \Delta z ) - f ( z )}{h}\]

Multiplying both the numerator and the denominator by $\Delta z$, we get:

\[D [ f ( g ( x ) ) ] & = \underset{h \rightarrow 0}{lim} \frac{f ( z + \Delta z ) - f ( z )}{\Delta z} \cdot \frac{\Delta z}{h} \\ & = \underset{h \rightarrow 0}{lim} \frac{f ( z + \Delta z ) - f ( z )}{\Delta z} \cdot \frac{g ( x + h ) - g ( x )}{h} \\ & = f^{'} ( z ) \cdot g^{'} ( x ) \\ & = f^{'} ( g ( x ) ) \cdot g^{'} ( x )\]

This argument assumes $\Delta z \neq 0$ for $h$ sufficiently small. A complete proof handles the case $\Delta z = 0$ separately via an auxiliary function; the conclusion is the same.


In the case of powers of a function, the rule generalizes as follows:

\[D [ f ( x )^{a} ] = a [ f ( x ) ]^{a - 1} f^{'} ( x )\]

Example 1

Let’s compute the derivative of the following composite function:

\[y = f ( g ( x ) ) = sin ⁡ ( 3 x^{2} + 2 x )\]

In this case, we have:

  • The inner function $g ( x ) = 3 x^{2} + 2 x$
  • The outer function $f ( t ) = sin ⁡ ( t )$, where $t = g ( x ) = 3 x^{2} + 2 x$

The outer function is $f ( t ) = sin ⁡ ( t )$. Its derivative is:

\[f^{'} ( t ) = cos ⁡ ( t )\]

Substituting $t = g ( x )$:

\[f^{'} ( g ( x ) ) = cos ⁡ ( 3 x^{2} + 2 x )\]

The inner function is $g ( x ) = 3 x^{2} + 2 x$. Its derivative is:

\[g^{'} ( x ) = 6 x + 2\]

Applying the chain rule we obtain:

\[D [ f ( g ( x ) ) ] = f^{'} ( g ( x ) ) \cdot g^{'} ( x )\]

The result is:

\[( 6 x + 2 ) cos ⁡ ( 3 x^{2} + 2 x )\]
Explore the case of composite power functions, specifically the calculation of the derivative of functions of the type: \(D [ f ( x )^{g ( x )} ]\)

Extension to multiple compositions

The chain rule can be extended to compositions involving three or more functions. For example, given $y = f ( g ( h ( x ) ) )$, the derivative is:

\[D [ f ( g ( h ( x ) ) ) ] = f^{'} ( g ( h ( x ) ) ) \cdot g^{'} ( h ( x ) ) \cdot h^{'} ( x )\]

Each factor represents the derivative of a function in the composition, evaluated at the composition of all subsequent functions. This pattern generalises to any finite number of nested functions. For $y = f_{1} ( f_{2} ( \hdots f_{n} ( x ) \hdots ) )$, the derivative is given by the product:

\[f_{1}^{'} ( f_{2} ( \hdots f_{n} ( x ) \hdots ) ) \cdot f_{2}^{'} ( f_{3} ( \hdots f_{n} ( x ) \hdots ) ) \hdots f_{n - 1}^{'} ( f_{n} ( x ) ) \cdot f_{n}^{'} ( x )\]

In practical applications, differentiation proceeds from the outermost function inward, with each derivative computed in sequence and the results multiplied together.


As an example, consider $y = sin ⁡ ( e^{3 x} )$. The composition involves three functions:

\[h ( x ) & = 3 x \\ g ( t ) & = e^{t} \\ f ( s ) & = sin ⁡ ( s )\]

Applying the chain rule from the outside inward we obtain:

\[D [ sin ⁡ ( e^{3 x} ) ] & = cos ⁡ ( e^{3 x} ) \cdot e^{3 x} \cdot 3 \\ & = 3 e^{3 x} cos ⁡ ( e^{3 x} )\]

Example 2

Consider the following function:

\[y = ln ⁡ ( e^{x^{2}} + 1 )\]

The composition involves three functions:

\[h ( x ) & = x^{2} \\ g ( t ) & = e^{t} + 1 \\ f ( s ) & = ln ⁡ ( s )\]

The derivative of the outer function $f ( s ) = ln ⁡ ( s )$ is $f^{‘} ( s ) = \frac{1}{s}$, evaluated at $s = g ( h ( x ) ) = e^{x^{2}} + 1$:

\[f^{'} ( g ( h ( x ) ) ) = \frac{1}{e^{x^{2}} + 1}\]

The derivative of the middle function $g ( t ) = e^{t} + 1$ is $g^{‘} ( t ) = e^{t}$, evaluated at $t = h ( x ) = x^{2}$:

\[g^{'} ( h ( x ) ) = e^{x^{2}}\]

The derivative of the inner function $h ( x ) = x^{2}$ is:

\[h^{'} ( x ) = 2 x\]

Applying the chain rule from the outside inward:

\[D [ ln ⁡ ( e^{x^{2}} + 1 ) ] & = \frac{1}{e^{x^{2}} + 1} \cdot e^{x^{2}} \cdot 2 x \\ & = \frac{2 x e^{x^{2}}}{e^{x^{2}} + 1}\]

The result is:

\[\frac{2 x e^{x^{2}}}{e^{x^{2}} + 1}\]

Selected references